|
Garden Architecture and Function:
Pliny and the Renaissance Garden
Architecture in the service of Christianity
put on pagan garments and continued to achieve
great things such as St. Peter's at Rome or St.
Paul's at London; painting and sculpture commenced,
even if they did not long continue, their new
life under church patronage, but the Church made
little use of gardens to promote its splendor.
The garden grew up around the individual as a
luxurious extension of the individual's private
life; it was a purely secular achievement, although
the Cardinals and Popes of the late Quattro cento
in their capacity as temporal princes had a good
deal to do with it. There were three threads
that linked the gardens of the fifteenth and
sixteenth centuries to the gardens of the ancient
world. The first thread was physical, the influence
of the actual ruins amidst which men lived. The
second was literary, the descriptions of ancient
gardens, particularly in the letters of the younger
Pliny. The third was traditional, through Byzantium
and the Moslem kingdoms of Spain. In a continent
of ruins the monastic orders often settled on
Roman villa sites so that the traditional physical
layout of a monastery was partly developed by
force of what they found there. Cloisters, for
example, are the Gothic shadows of the Roman
epistyles, an enclosed rectangle surrounded
by a covered walk or arcade. Fortresses as well
as monasteries developed among the ruins. Barbarian
magnates settled in the places which had been
of sufficient charm and convenience to attract
their original owners, and which still, however
ruinous, provided shelter much superior to any
that Vandal, Frank, or Goth had leisure, or probably
ability, to build. Medieval gardens, both monastic
and secular, such as they were (and they were
not very much), were shaped by the roofless walls
of an earlier time. The world in which the peculiar
condition we call medievalism was established
was deeply and extensively a Roman world, consequently
the underlying, unseen influence of Rome was
everywhere and no single aspect of Europe was,
or indeed is, free from it; certainly gardens
were not. The medieval gardens that grew up in
these circumstances were functional rather than
ornamental. Herbs were grown for healing and
the pot, a small orchard provided fruit, flowers
had sometimes culinary and medicinal uses, but
were chiefly for decorating the table or the
Church.
|