|
Classical Garden:
Pliny and the Renaissance Garden
Subsequent winners of the games were honoured
by statues that stood beside the hero's and the
essential accents of the Classical Garden were
established. The fullest development of the domestic
arts requires a wealthy aristocracy competing
in display, but the quarrelsome egalitarianism
of the Greeks was constantly striving to pull
down any who showed signs of wealth and power.
The towns were small and restricted. There was
little opportunity for the development of lavish
private gardens, and whatever may have existed
in the way of a leisured villa life in the countryside
before the Persian Wars (there was probably none)
would have suffered a severe set-back at that
time. After the repulse of Asia there was the
possibility of a luxurious outburst of rural
or suburban life, but it was destroyed by the
Peloponnesian Wars, which virtually made into
a devastated no-man's-land the area between the
cities where such a life might have flourished.
The firm hand of Alexander and his successors
of Macedon, and subsequently of the Romans, gave
to the Greeks a degree of political stability
they were incapable of giving themselves. Out
of this unnatural condition arose a way of life
deeply tinged by the luxuries of the East, but
whatever luxuries the East taught them were still
shaped and contained by the colonnaded courtyard
or by the public park. Unlike the sea-faring
volatile Greeks, the Romans were men of the soil.
The tradition of their origin is that they were
robbers turned farmers and they retained the
characteristics of both professions throughout
their history. Deep in their nature was a love
of land, so that when they ceased to be farmers
their appetite for acres still drove them on
to build up vast estates. They understood the
land, its varying nature and what it would grow,
and it was always of far greater importance to
them than to the city-loving Greeks. But, and
this may have been one great source of their
enduring strength, like the parvenus they always
remained, the Romans lacked the self-confidence
to be great innovators in the arts. By taking
others for their model and imitating as closely
as they could they produced by the inherent force
of their personalities something new but traditionally
new; it is by this route that cultures endure.
In the days when Rome was a grasping town of
bandits and outcasts struggling for hegemony
over Italy, and when the conflict with Carthage
still raged, she was not much concerned with
the arts of peace and set herself no models.
Etruscan forms were the accepted ones in the
Roman mind no doubt because the Etruscans, a
more advanced people, had been first their neighbours,
for a time their masters, and finally their subdued
allies.
|