|
Lack of Water in Gardens:
French Gardens
Of all the natural disadvantages of the site
the lack of sufficient water was the greatest
. . . `No matter what was done, the great fountains
dried up . . . in spite of the oceans of reservoirs
that cost so many millions to engineer in that
sandy or boggy soil. . . . That same lack of
water brought about the destruction of the French
infantry, for peace reigned at that time and
M. de Louvois conceived the notion of changing
the course of the Eure between Chartres and Maintenon,
so as to bring that river bodily to Versailles.
Who could ever count the gold and men lost in
an attempt which was continued for several years?
They made a camp at the site of the works, and
in the end it was forbidden under heavy penalties
to mention the sick, or still worse, the dying,
whom the hard labour and exhalations from the
turned earth were taking off day by day. How
many soldiers wasted long years in trying to
recover their health? How many more never did
recover? During the whole of that time, not only
junior officers, but colonels, brigadiers, and
even generals employed there, were forbidden
to absent themselves a quarter of an hour, or
miss so much as a quarter of an hour's duty on
the site. The enterprise finally came to an end
with the war of 1688. . . . Nothing remains but
shapeless mounds to perpetuate the memory of
a barbarous piece of folly." The guide-book
says one should pause on the steps of the great
parterre, and then, after suitable checks at
les points de vue to admire the fountains in
their complex relationships, one should proceed
to the far end of le tapis vert as far as the
great canal. At this point the view back to the
palace is, of course, particularly commended.
Thereafter the various groves on the left of
the avenue have to be threaded in succession
until the orangery is reached . . . after that
you cross the parterre and work through the groves
on the right. There is something very new about
a garden that requires a guide-book for visitors,
and, moreover, a guide-book written by a King,
for Louis himself wrote it. For him Versailles
was a principal part of the gigantic `show-off'
of which his long reign consisted. He was proud
of it and of the admiration it caused; its fame
was his fame.
|