|
The Famous Gardeners:
French Gardens
His sons Andre and Gabriel were gardeners
at St. James's Park, London, during the interregnum
and continued under Charles II. Another son carried
the French garden to Sweden, and it is said that
a Claude Mollet, whether father or son is not
clear, was employed by James I. Claude Mollet's
famous and influential book Le Theatre des Plans
et Jardinages, although not published until 1652,
was composed about 1613. The genius of Andre
Le Notre did not spring from uncultivated ground.
Naturally his early days are least well known
to us. In 1649 he was a designer of the Royal
gardens and received a salary; in 1657 he was
appointed Controller-General of Royal Buildings.
Vaux-le-Vicomte was started in 1650 and in 1652
the `wonderful gardens' there were already referred
to in the dedication of Claude Mollet's book.
There is no evidence what designing Le Notre
had done before Vaux. His craft he learned at
the Tuileries; his eye was trained during the
period when, with Le Brun as a fellow pupil,
he learned painting under Simon Vouet; from 1640
Poussin lived in the Tuileries gardens, a contact
which could hardly have been without influence
on his mind. Fouquet had been Richelieu's protege;
Andre Le Notre's father had been employed by
Richelieu in 1629; Fouquet will scarcely have
needed the recommendations of Le Brun to employ
one who at the age of 37 had already for thirteen
years been heir apparent to the position of First
Gardener at the Tuileries. Influence and opportunity
were not wanting; experience and traditional
learning were at his elbow; the lesson of grandeur,
the courage to conceive vast designs, Fouquet
taught him. At Melun Fouquet bought three villages
and pulled them down because they were in the
way. At one time he employed there as many as
eighteen thousand labourers. It is important
to realize the sort of garden that Le Notre was
required to provide at Vaux-le-Vicomte. It was
not to be a spot in which a cultured than might
take pleasure with his friends, the need which
inspired the gardens of the Medici; still less
was its principal purpose to supply seclusion
for repose or love; it was primarily to be a
stupendous theatre for fetes.
|