|
French Architect Du Perac:
French Gardens
In France it reached its most sophisticated
form at the end of the sixteenth century. In
1582 the French architect Du Perac returned from
a long stay in Italy, where he appears to have
acquired the notion of treating the whole parterre
as a unit, and relating each subdivision of it
to the rest instead of planning each as an individual
tour de force to be regarded on its own. Obviously
if a whole garden was to be given up to one large
design it must be seen from above, and if raised
walks did not already exist they had to be made.
Henri IV made in this way the famous mulberry
walk around the flat and featureless Tuileries.
Even later, when the French vista garden reached
its fullest stage of development, the French
still retained their fondness for this type of
parterre, the compartiment de broderie, but by
then terraces were provided only on one or at
most on three sides, so that the parterre could
form a base for the avenue. Historians are rarely
inclined to allow the credit of inventing anything
to anybody; it is their delight to observe the
stream of influence and suggestion and to ignore
the spontaneous combustion of an idea. It is
certainly true that Du Perac came back from Italy
with the idea and created the first compartiment
de broderie at the Chateau of Anet, but it is
not clear that he found the idea already developed
in Italy; it certainly never flourished there
as it did in France. It is probable that the
notion of unifying a garden, which was already
familiar to the Italians, combined with the rediscovery
of the arabesque from Spain to produce these
exquisite foliated shapes. It is wrong to suppose
that flowers were gradually banished from the
parterre; in so far as the parterre derived from
the labyrinth they were never there, but in so
far as the involved design within the beds was
there to divide the flowers into their appropriate
blocks then Du Perac virtually banished them.
His compartiments de broderie could never serve
such a subordinate purpose; they were the pride
of the garden, the loveliest things there.
|