|
Small Scale Garden: The Garden of Euphues
Far from being under French influence, no country
more desperately opposed it. Yet despite their
differences Dutch and Flemish gardens have one
important thing in common: they are normally
on a smaller scale than the French. The strength
of Flanders in the Middle Ages lay in its vigorous
democratic town life rather than in an aristocracy
seated among towers and battlements. The gardens
of about 1600 are those of rising burghers, not
of decaying barons; they are urban and suburban
in character. It is, perhaps, a matter of emphasis;
in the nature of things there could be no Amboise,
Blois or Fontainebleau, and lacking these the
records that remain to us are of town gardens.
Paris also had its town gardens, but it is not
surprising if, with the Tuileries and St. Germain
on the doorstep, the ornamental backyards of
merchants should have mostly escaped record.
Had we equally good pictures of French town gardens,
it might appear that a sixteenth-century garden
at Amiens or Tours was much like one at Ghent
or Bruges. Later, when Le Notre was the fashion,
we do know that the small town garden in Paris
was usually completely occupied by a compartiment
de broderie. The great man was asked to produce
designs and he did so, but they might just as
well have been the designs of Boyceau or the
Mollets or any talented embroiderer. Somewhere
about the middle of the seventeenth century there
occurred a break between the sophisticated French
attitude to the small garden and that of the
rest of Europe. No one could suppose the embroidery
parterre of the French a pleasant place for a
stroll, or a pleasance in which the owner could
entertain his friends or idle away a sunny hour
by himself. Its only purpose was to be seen from
the upstair windows, to look neat and trim and
elegant and expensive. The only person who ever
needed to set foot in the French town garden
was the gardener and the only tool he needed
was a broom. But the strange small Flemish gardens
illustrated by Vredeman de Vries lack such a
logical basis. They still consist chiefly of
ground patterns which could most fully be seen
from above, but unlike the French parterres they
are not the sort of patterns that are intended
to be enjoyed visually as pictures; they have
a vertical existence as well; there are trees
and arbours and covered trellis walks which interfere
with the view from the windows and indicate a
garden to walk in, to sit in, to play in and
to make love in.
|