|
Land for Gardens: The Garden of Euphues
However, save to the botanical gardeners, much
of this knowledge was soon to be valueless, for
in the new type of garden very little of it would
be required. It has been said that there is no
such thing as a typical Dutch garden, as it has
also been said that there is no typically Spanish
garden and no typically German and Scandinavian
gardens. In the sense that none of these nations
evolved a national garden so easily distinguished
in plan as those of Italy in the sixteenth, France
in the seventeenth and England in the eighteenth
centuries, this is true; but it is impossible
for a virile community, as all these were, to
accept external influences without giving them
a local twist or national flavour. Sometimes
the hybrid, as in the case of French and English
gardens, develops a difference that is fundamental,
but more often there are differences in detail,
in emphasis, or in spirit. These small differences
are not to be dismissed as merely superficial.
The individual character of a garden as of any
other work of art can be as dependent upon surface
qualities as upon underlying design. The physical
peculiarity of Holland is so great that the influence
of political factors, which might also have been
dramatic, can very nearly be ignored. In the
first place the flatness of the land obviously
precludes any general development of terracing.
Where there are no considerable differences in
level it is an effort to provide water fountains and
cascades. The possibility of lavish water works
without auxiliary power as at the Villa d'Este
never occurred in Holland and Zeeland, nor even
in Brabant or Flanders. The land is for the most
part alluvial; stone is therefore not to be had
locally in great quantities, and the Roman architectural
garden would have been extravagantly costly to
create. The land was agriculturally rich, thickly
populated and intensively cultivated; gardens
therefore were limited in size. Most positive
influence of all was the frequency of drainage
canals. The medieval garden was rectilinear because
it grew up amongst the ruins of buildings; but
straight lines and right-angles are as inexorably
imposed by canals as they are by wall decor.
|