|
Gardens of Granada: Garden Design in the Americas
There is also talk of marble porticoes and
pavilions, light arcades, baths, and cedar groves,
which together convey an impression of the Villa
d'Este crossed with Stourhead. If these descriptions
are true (and there are the remains of terraces
which seem to substantiate them) the gardens
of the Aztec king must have been very like those
of great Asiatic potentates; they read like Marco
Polo's account of the gardens of Kublai Khan... indeed, they read suspiciously like a description
of the gardens at Granada in the conqueror's
own land of Spain, and the similarity with Spain
becomes even more striking when we hear of internal
courts or patios in which there are outdoor fountains.
But in all this it is necessary to make some
allowance for what the conquistadores thought
they were seeing, which would naturally assume
the shape of things they knew, and also perhaps
some allowance for what they believed that their
correspondents in Spain would be impressed by
their seeing. The court of Spain knew the gardens
of Granada and they knew patios: that Montezuma
possessed similar gardens magnified the achievement
of those who had overcome him. If the palace
gardens of Mexico were really like this it would
argue that some secondary tradition hastened
their development into these elaborate forms.
Perhaps we should look for the missing influence
in the shadowy Toltec civilization which stood
to the Aztecs as Rome to the Italian Renaissance.
But although there are remains of Toltec buildings,
there are none now of their gardens or their
literature by which we can judge them. Again
it is possible that the religion of the Aztecs,
fanatical, priest-ridden, based on fear and sacrifice,
dictated their attitude to nature and consequently
shaped their gardens rather as animism in quite
a different way shaped the gardens of China.
If so, there is no evidence of it.
|